TRUMP, MAGATS, FASCISM AND TERRORISM. PART 2.

 "DON'T IT ALWAYS SEEM TO GO, THAT YOU DON'T  KNOW WHAT YOU GOT 'TIL IT'S GONE."

FROM THE SONG "BIG YELLOW TAXI."

TERRORISM-  THE USE OF VIOLENCE, OR THREAT OF SUCH, TO ADVANCE THE DOCTRINE, IDEOLOGY, RULES, OR GOALS OF A GIVEN AND IDENTIFIABLE GROUP THAT IS NOT GENERALLY REGARDED AS A LEGITIMATE POLITICAL ENTITY, OR THE RECOGNIZED LEGAL AUTHORITY FOR A RESIDENT POPULATION OR GEOGRAPHICAL AREA.

The following exchange occurred during a White House Press conference on Wednesday, Sept 24, 2020.

 “Win, lose, or draw in this election, will you commit here today for a peaceful transferal of power after the election?” reporter Brian Karem asked Donald Trump, who didn’t even attempt to give the impression he cares whatsoever about preserving democracy. “Well, we’re going to have to see what happens,” Trump said. “You know that. I’ve been complaining very strongly about the ballots, and the ballots are a disaster.” Pressed again to “commit to making sure that there’s a peaceful transferal of power,” Trump responded, “Get rid of the ballots and...we’ll have a very peaceful—there won’t be a transfer, frankly. There will be a continuation. The ballots are out of control. You know it. You know who knows it better than anybody else? The Democrats know better than anybody else.”

''...Pressed again to “commit to making sure that there’s a peaceful transferal of power,” Trump responded, “Get rid of the ballots and...we’ll have a very peaceful—there won’t be a transfer, frankly. There will be a continuation."

IN OTHER WORDS, DO WHAT I TELL YOU AND WE WON'T NEED A TRANSFER OF POWER, JUST A PEACEFUL CONTINUATION.

Here, Donald "Bravely" discusses Hillary Clintons views on GUN CONTROL, and how her 2nd Amendment opponents might...

TRUMP, MAGATS, FASCISM AND TERRORISM. PART 1.

 "DON'T IT ALWAYS SEEM TO GO, THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU GOT 'TIL IT'S GONE."

FROM THE SONG "BIG YELLOW TAXI."

FASCISM - FORM OF GOVERNMENT IN WHICH ALL POWER, POLITICAL ,LEGAL, SOCIAL RESTS WITH ONE PERSON AND/OR A SELECT FEW.

DICTATOR- ALL POWER RESTS WITH ONE PERSON.

JUNTA OR RULING COUNCIL- POWER RESTS WITH A FEW, HALF-DOZEN OR SO.

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS CIVIL RIGHTS. LAW ENFORCEMENT AT ALL LEVELS IS CONTROLLED BY ONE SOURCE.

THE MILITARY PLEDGES ALLEGIANCE TO THE RULER(S).

RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IS ALLOWED ONLY AS FAR AS PERMITTED, DEPENDING ON HOW IT SERVES THE PURPOSE OF THE RULING GOVERNMENT.

COURTS ARE ADMINISTERED BY SELECTED JUDICIAL FLUNKIES, WHO KNOW THAT THEIR DECISIONS MUST BE AGREEABLE TO THE FASCIST LEADERSHIP, OR THEY ARE OUT.

THERE CAN BE ELECTIONS, WHERE ALL CANDIDATES ARE CAREFULLY SELECTED BY THE DESPOTS IN POWER. THERE IS NO PARTY SYSTEM ALLOWED. NO REAL OPPOSITION.

EVEN IF SOME FORM OF ELECTION(S) IS ALLOWED, THE RESULTS MUST BE AGREEABLE TO THE POWERS THAT BE, OR THEY ARE VOIDED. 

THE NEWS MEDIA IS NOTHING MORE THAN A SYSTEM OF PAID PROPAGANDISTS, NO OPPOSITION IS PERMITTED.

MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL- THE LEADERSHIP IS ACCOUNTABLE TO NO ONE. SINCE THEY ARE THE SOURCE OF ALL LAW, THEY CAN NOT AND WILL NOT BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR ANY ACTIONS THEY UNDERTAKE. 

MAGATS AND TRUMPIANS- ONE IN THE SAME. INDIVIDUALS WHO PLACE THEIR LOYALTY TO DONALD TRUMP ABOVE ALL OTHER POLITICAL, LEGAL, AND SOCIAL OBLIGATIONS.

BY DEFINITION: THEY MAY SAY THEY ARE AMERICANS, BUT THAT DEFINITION IS DEFINED BY DONALD TRUMP, NOT THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.

DONALD TRUMP IS THE FINAL JUDGE ON ALL THINGS- CRIMINAL ACTS, ELECTION LAW, THE COURT SYSTEM, ALL FORMS OF THE MEDIA. etc.

IN FACT, GIVE ANY EXAMPLE OF A BEHAVIOR THAT HE HAS ENGAGED IN, THAT YOU CONSIDER TO HAVE BEEN DISAPPROVED OF BY A MEASURABLE % OF MAGATS OR TRUMPIANS. (NOT EVEN A MAJORITY, BUT A LARGE ENOUGH GROUP THAT COULD BE IDENTIFIED AND RELIED UPON TO MAINTAIN THAT OPINION)

TERRORISM-  THE USE OF VIOLENCE, OR THREAT OF SUCH, TO ADVANCE THE DOCTRINE, IDEOLOGY, RULES, OR GOALS OF A GIVEN AND IDENTIFIABLE GROUP THAT IS NOT GENERALLY REGARDED AS A LEGITIMATE POLITICAL ENTITY, OR THE RECOGNIZED LEGAL AUTHORITY FOR A RESIDENT POPULATION OR GEOGRAPHICAL AREA.

NO, I DO NOT CONSIDER MAGATS OR TRUMPIANS A LEGITIMATE POLITICAL GROUP. THEIR ACTIONS AND GOALS PLACE THEM AS ADHERENTS TO A WANNABE ALL-POWERFUL DICTATOR- DONALD TRUMP.

2022 MID-TERMS: LEARN FROM 2016 AND 2018 RESULTS- TRUMP AND THE GOP CANNOT BE TRUSTED. DEMOCRATS, DO NOT RELY ON YOUR STATE PARTY OFFICIALS TO GET IT RIGHT...

 ...AND HERE IS WHY...

BELOW IS A REPOSTING OF AN ARTICLE I WROTE SHORTLY AFTER THE 2018 MID-TERMS, COMPARING THEM TO THE 2016 RESULTS.  THE TWO RESULTS SHOWED ONE THING: THAT THERE WAS DEFINITE EVIDENCE OF FRAUD, AND IT WAS THE REPUBLICAN PARTY THAT BENEFITTED. FOR SOME REASON, TRUMP WAS ALLOWED TO CLAIM THAT DEMOCRATS COMMITTED FRAUD IN BOTH ELECTIONS, AND THE DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP SAID AND DID NOTHING TO POINT OUT THAT IT WAS TRUMP AND THE GOP THAT WERE THE BENFICIARIES OF BOGUS RESULTS. DEMOCRATS IN FLORIDA, OHIO, TEXAS AND VIRGINIA: DO NOT TRUST THAT YOUR STATE PARTY LEADERSHIP WILL DO THE RIGHT THING. THEY HAVEN'T DONE IT LATELY. DEMOCRATS IN ALL OTHER STATES, YOU ARE DEALING WITH A GOP THAT IS LITTLE MORE THAN A CRIME SYNDICATE. THEY HAVE ADOPTED THE SAME FASCIST AND TOTALITARIAN TACTICS THAT BROUGHT HITLER, MUSSOLINI, STALIN, MAO ZEDONG TO POWER, AND KEPT THEM THERE. SO, IT DOES NOT MATTER IF YOU ARE IN A LIBERAL STRONGHOLD, OR A TRUMP DUMPING GROUND, TAKE NOTHING FOR GRANTED, AND DON'T EVER STOP ASKING THE RIGHT QUESTIONS.

FOR THOSE OF YOU VOTING FOR THE FIRST OR SECOND TIME, (18-30 OR SO), IT IS YOUR CHANCE TO SEIZE CONTROL OF THIS COUNTRIES DESTINY. WHAT KIND OF WORLD DO YOU WANT FOR YOUR FAMILY, FRIENDS... CHILDREN, NIECES, NEPHEWS etc. IT IS YOUR TIME NOW. WITH AGE SHOULD COME WISDOM, BUT TAKE IT FROM ME (50+), IT DOESN'T ALWAYS TURN OUT THAT WAY. TOO MANY OF MY "GENERATION" REMEMBER THE 1980s, AND TAKE TO HEART THE "IT'S ONLY WRONG IF YOU GET CAUGHT" MENTALITY. WHEN A PRESIDENT COULD LIE TO US ON CAMERA, WITH A SMILE, AND WE WERE SUPPOSED TO JUST ACCEPT IT. THAT IS WHAT YOU HAVE WITH YOUR HARD CORE TRUMPIANS, ETHICS AND MORALITY ARE FOR FOOLS, OR THOSE NAIVE ENOUGH TO THINK THAT THE GOP LEADERSHIP CARES ABOUT "CHRISTIAN" VALUES. (UNLESS, OF COURSE, THEY CAN BE DEFINED IN A WAY THAT ALLOWS DICTATORIAL RULE.)

HOW DOES A POLITICAL PARTY WIN 64.7% (22-12) OF THE SEATS UP FOR RE-ELECTION, WITH 42.4% OF THE POPULAR VOTE?

\  

If you have spent virtually any amount of time on this website,
the topic of the 2016 Presidential Election would be something
that would be hard to miss. I have covered and written extensively
on the Candidates, Issues, and Results. Through all of this, I came
to one CONCLUSION: THE RESULTS IN AT LEAST 6 STATES WERE
BOGUS, AND DELIBERATELY ALTERED TO ENSURE DONALD TRUMPS
ELECTION TO THE OVAL OFFICE. I AM NOT GOING TO REVIEW ALL
THIS INFORMATION HERE, SINCE IT IS AVAILABLE IN OTHER AREAS
ON THIS WEBSITE. 

HOWEVER, WHAT ABOUT POSSIBLE IRREGULARITIES IN OTHER
RACES?  WELL, I WAITED UNTIL THE 2018 MID-TERM ELECTIONS
WERE 0VER, AND ANALYZED THE NUMBERS FROM THE 2016 AND 2018
U.S. SENATE ELECTIONS. 

HERE IS THE RESULT. 



With the Mississippi Senatorial contest over, we can now examine

the 2018 Mid-Term elections, and see what they tell us about the 
New Make Up of the U.S. Senate.

2018 SENATE ELECTION RESULTS.

DEMOCRATS- 22 VICTORIES.  

REPUBLICANS- 11 VICTORIES.

INDEPENDENTS- 2 VICTORIES.

DEMOCRATS DEFENDED 24 SEATS.
20 WINS.        4 LOSSES.

REPUBLICANS DEFENDED 9 SEATS.
7 WINS           2 LOSSES.

INDEPENDENTS DEFENDED AND WON 2 SEATS.

THE NEW SENATE WILL BE MADE UP OF:
53 REPUBLICANS
45 DEMOCRATS.
2 INDEPENDENTS.

VOTE TOTALS.

DEMOCRATS- 52,260,651    58.4%

REPUBLICANS- 34,723,013  38.8%

INDEPENDENTS- 892,988     1.0%

NOW, LET US EXAMINE THE 2016 SENATE ELECTION RESULTS. 2016 SENATE ELECTION RESULTS. REPUBLICANS-  22 VICTORIES. DEMOCRATS-  12 VICTORIES. REPUBLICANS DEFENDED 24 SEATS. 22 WINS.     2 LOSSES. DEMOCRATS DEFENDED 10 SEATS. 10 WINS.     0 LOSSES. THE 2016 ELECTION CREATES A SENATE  THAT CONSISTS OF: 51 REPUBLICANS.  47 DEMOCRATS. 2 INDEPENDENTS. 2016 VOTE TOTALS. DEMOCRATS-  51,496,682    53.8% REPUBLICANS- 40,402,790  42.4% What do the results of these elections tell us, if they are compared to one another? THE MOST APPARENT CHARACTERISTIC IS HOW SIMILAR THE RESULTS ARE, IN THAT  THE RESULTS OF ONE ELECTION BASICALLY  CANCELS OUT THE RESULTS OF THE OTHER. # OF SEATS CONTESTED. 2016- 34. 2018- 35. # OF TOTAL WINS. 2016- REPUBLICANS: 22 WINS,            DEMOCRATS: 12 WINS.  2018- DEMOCRATS: 22 WINS.           REPUBLICANS: 11 WINS. RECORD RETAINING SEATS. 2016- REP. DEFENDED 24 SEATS. 22 WINS- 2 LOSSES. DEM. DEFENDED 10 SEATS. 10 WINS 0 LOSSES. 2018- DEM. DEFENDED 24 SEATS. 20 WINS - 4 LOSSES. REP. DEFENDED 9 SEATS. 7 WINS- 2 LOSSES. # OF SEATS THAT CHANGED HANDS. 2016- TOTAL: 2, BOTH REPUBLICAN. 2018- TOTAL: 6, 4 DEMOCRATS, 2 REPUBLICAN. BOTH PARTIES LOST A TOTAL OF 4 SEATS EACH, WHEN BOTH ELECTIONS ARE COMBINED. As you can see, the results seem to almost mirror one another. That, in itself, does not provide adequate evidence to conclude that the results are fraudulent . However, that changes if we look at the  one variable that seems to contradict the  "MIRROR IMAGE" COMPARISON. IN 2018, THE DEMOCRATS WERE VICTORIOUS IN 22 RACES, THE REPUBLICANS 11. THAT IS A RATIO OF 2 TO 1. WHEN WE EXAMINE THE POPULAR VOTE, THE NUMBERS ARE: VOTE TOTALS. DEMOCRATS- 52,260,651    58.4% REPUBLICANS- 34,723,013  38.8% INDEPENDENTS- 892,988     1.0% THESE NUMBERS ARE WHAT WE SHOULD EXPECT, GIVEN THE # OF VICTORIES FOR THE DEMOCRATS,  AS COMPARED TO THE # OF REPUBLICAN WINS. WHAT ABOUT 2016? IN 2016,THE REPUBLICANS WERE VICTORIOUS  IN 22 RACES, THE # OF DEMOCRATS WINS WAS 12. AS YOU CAN SEE, THE 2016 AND 2018 ELECTIONS SAW 22 VICTORIES FOR EACH PARTY, WITH ONLY 1 SEAT SEPERATING THE TOTAL # OF LOSSES. HERE IS THE POPULAR VOTE: 2016 VOTE TOTALS. DEMOCRATS-  51,496,682    53.8% REPUBLICANS- 40,402,790  42.4% DO YOU SEE IT? IN 2018, THE DEMOCRATS HAD A SUBSTANTIAL LEAD IN THE POPULAR VOTE, 58.4% TO 38.8%, AND WERE ABLE TO POST AN ELECTION RECORD OF 22 WINS AND 11 LOSSES. (I AM NOT COUNTING THE IND. VICTORIES) IN 2016, THE REPUBLICANS RECEIVED 42.4% OF THE POPULAR VOTE, WHICH WAS 11.4% LESS THAN THAT OF THE DEMOCRATS 53.8% EVEN THOUGH THE RESULTS ARE VIRTUALLY IDENTICAL, THE REPUBLICANS ACHIEVED THEIR ELECTION RECORD IN 2016 WITH 42.4% OF THE POPULAR VOTE. THE 2018 DEMOCRATS NEEDED 58% OF THE POPULAR VOTE TO ACHIEVE THE SAME RESULT. HOW DOES A POLITICAL PARTY WIN 64.7% (22-12) OF THE SEATS UP FOR RE- ELECTION, WITH 42.4% OF THE POPULAR VOTE? REMEMBER, THE BOGUS PRESIDENTIAL RETURNS IN 2016 HAD DONALD TRUMP WINNING 60% OF THE STATES WITH ABOUT 47% OF THE POPULAR VOTE.

REMINDER #4. DID IT EVER OCCUR TO YOU THAT A RISE IN THE CRIME RATE IS NOT PROGRESSIVES LENIENT ATTITUDE, BUT THE GOPS/TRUMPS ENCOURAGING VIOLENT CRIME?

This is the #1 Tactic used by Trumpians and their Fascist Allies in promoting every piece of Bogus, Invalid, Untrue, and Non-Sensical News Items to deceive the Public-At- Large. This is to show that they are not really the Uneducated and Hate-Filled Buffoons who worship a Sociopathic Hate-Monger, which is claimed by the opposition, but people who "KNOW" the truth. In fact, they are so "HONEST" there is no need to even question what they claim to be true. Just sit back, close your eyes, and become the Intellectual Bobbleheads that they can control. If that includes gunning down innocent victims, hey you have to break a few eggs to make an omelet.

THE "EMPTY" ASSERTION: THE DEMAGOGUES BEST FRIEND...

"EMPTY" ASSERTION-  ANY STATEMENT, (WRITTEN OR ORAL), THAT CLAIMS TO BE FACTUAL, BUT HAS LITTLE SUPPORTING EVIDENCE OR DATA THAT CAN WITHSTAND PROPER SCRUTINY.  In many cases, the act of criticizing the Assertion is discouraged, AND IT MUST BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT QUALIFICATION.

THE EMPTY ASSERTION works best when it feeds into preconceived ideas and conclusions. It allows those with little Intellectual Evidence to support their opinions on certain issues, to make "FACTUAL CLAIMS" that are not based on the Rules of Logic. 

It gives the Opportunist the chance to prey on the Prejudice and Irrationality of those who don't want Reality and Truth to keep them from forcing their own brand of "TRUTH" on everyone else.

Some examples might include;

-  Inventing a causal relationship between certain groups, that their place of Birth or National Origin automatically indicates the Increased Chance that they are likely to carry a communicable disease. This is done without actually researching the statistics to back up this conclusion with factual data.

-  That the Existence of a Right according to Constitutional Law is found not to be Valid by Judicial Decision, will lead to an immediate Government crackdown to eliminate any trace of the Subject Matter ruled on before the Court.

-  That an Accusation of MORAL or CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT, automatically means there is Sufficient Grounds or Evidence, to make such a Statement.  In fact, there may be nothing at all.  The Accusation is just a Tool to mislead, and place an undeserved Tag on an Opponent or Rival Organization.

Remember, the "EMPTY ASSERTION" does not need to provide any Reasonable Explanation for anything that is said, or claimed to be true.